EU: Law applicable to agency agreements – the UNAMAR v. Navigation Maritime Bulgare case (Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 17 October 2013).

The case concerned an agency contract between a Bulgarian shipping company (NMB) and a Belgian agent (UNAMAR), containing a choice-of-law clause in favour of the laws of Bulgaria and an arbitration clause in favour of a Bulgarian arbitration institution. When the contract was terminated, UNAMAR brought a claim before the Belgian courts requesting goodwill indemnity […]

Read More…

SPAIN: Distribution agreements – damages indemnity: previous notice and abuse of right.

The general rule for this kind of indefinite agreements permits the parties to freely and unilaterally terminate the agreement with no reason but giving a previous notice even when the agreement does not foresee it. The absence of this previous notice can be seen as an abuse of right or an unfair behaviour and although […]

Read More…

FRANCE: an interesting case law on selective distribution.

French Supreme Court, Commercial Chamber, 24 September 2013, Case no. 12- 14.344 The French Supreme Court has upheld a Court of Appeals’ decision finding that a clause was disproportionate and thus anticompetitive because it required the selected distributors to prove the physical presence of a qualified pharmacist in order to be able to retail their products […]

Read More…

USA: Conflicting cases addressing franchisee associations’ ‘associational standing’ to bring suits against a franchisor on behalf of franchisee members.

In NIACCF, Inc. v. Cold Stone Creamery, Inc., Case No. 12-20756-Civ-SCOLA, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70256 (S.D. Fla. May 21, 2012), the United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted a franchisor’s motion to stay a lawsuit filed by an independent franchisee association, pending a motion to compel arbitration in an Arizona […]

Read More…

UK: Yam Seng Pte Limited v International Trade Corporation Limited [2013] EWC 111 (QB).

The judge stated that these ‘relational’ contracts: ‘…may require a high degree of communication, cooperation and predictable performance based on mutual trust and confidence and involve expectations of loyalty which are not legislated for in express terms of the contract but are implicit in the parties’ understanding and necessary to give business efficacy to the […]

Read More…

U.S.A: Appellate Court finds that franchisor could be vicariously liable for the acts of a franchisee’s manager.

A summary judgment is a judgment rendered by a court that no material issues of fact exist and that one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law based on the parties’ pleadings. In the case at issue, a franchisee’s employee alleged suffering sexual harassment, assault, battery, and constructive wrongful termination at the […]

Read More…

FRANCE: Two interesting case law about on-line sales.

French Supreme Court, Commercial Chamber, 10 September 2013, Case no. 12- 11.701 A franchisor had granted its franchisee territorial exclusivity ‘in order to guarantee [it], in terms of customers, a sufficient zone of attraction in view of the concept.’ As the franchisor had opened a website to sell its products and distributed catalogues mentioning the website address with […]

Read More…

The IDI website features a new franchising country expert for Poland.

A new country report on franchising in Poland is now available in the Reports Section of the website, provided by Magdalena Kowalczuk – Szymanska , the new IDI country Expert for Poland. The CV of the new country expert can be found in the Experts’ Section of the IDI website, while all the main laws, particularly rules on franchising, […]

Read More…

SPAIN: The Proposal for a New Spanish Mercantile Code has been presented in Madrid.

With the presence of Mr. Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón, Ministry of Justice of the kingdom of Spain, it has been presented in June 20th 2013 the new Proposal for a Mercantile Code. The document is the result of more than six years’ work of the Commercial Section of the National Commission for Codification. The Proposal contains regulations […]

Read More…

FRANCE: Abrupt terminations of commercial relationships: insufficiency of results, redeployment of the victim, prolongation of the notice period.

French Supreme Court, Commercial Chamber, 9 July 2013, Case no. 12-21.001 French Supreme Court, Commercial Chamber, 9 July 2013, Case no. 12-20.468 French Supreme Court, Commercial Chamber, 11 June 2013, Case no. 12-21.424 In the first of the above-captioned cases, the Supreme Court ruled that an appellate court could not deny a claim for compensation under Article L. […]

Read More…

NORWAY: termination compensation awarded to a Norwegian distributor – based on analogues application of german case law.

There is no comparable EU directive in relation to distributorship agreements, and until now Norwegian courts have not awarded (sole) distributors rights on termination of the distributorship. However in a decision dated 4th of June 2013 the appeal court of Borgarting (‘Appeal Court’) ordered Webasto AG to pay its Norwegian distributor (KCL) 10MNOK as a […]

Read More…

TURKEY: Decision of the 11th Chamber of the Court of Appeals on a post non-competing obligation in a franchising contract.

In its decision, the court ruled that the parties’ one year of post-contractual non-compete clause of the franchising contract was void, based on Article 48 of the Constitution and Articles 19 and 20 of the former Turkish Code of Obligations. More precisely, the court stated that such a post-contractual non-compete obligation is against the freedom […]

Read More…

U.S.A.: Appellate Court reverses lower court’s finding that franchise agreement was renewable in perpetuity.

The franchise agreements at issue, which were governed by Missouri law, contained an initial term of five years and provided that the agreement ‘shall automatically renew itself for successive five-year terms.’ They further provided that the franchisee could elect not to renew if it gave Block 120 days’ notice, but were silent as to any […]

Read More…

POLAND: an interesting judgement on goodwill indemnity in agency contracts.

According to Article 7643 of the Civil Code after the agency contract is terminated, the agent may demand a compensatory performance (goodwill indemnity) from the principal if, during the term of the agency contract, he obtained new clients or led to a significant increase in turnover with existing clients, and the principal continues to draw […]

Read More…

AUSTRALIA: Franchising Code 2013 Review.

  As the Review’s Discussion Paper by appointed reviewer Alan Wein outlines, the 2008 amendments were engineered to increase the transparency and quality of franchisor disclosure. The 2010 amendments consolidated this, and upped the ante, firstly by increasing regulation of franchisor-franchisee interactions in dispute resolution processes, and secondly by focussing on the undercurrent of good […]

Read More…

IDI WEBSITE: New Country Experts and Reports.

We are glad to inform you that the IDI website features five new Country Experts: ALGERIA (agency & distribution): Yamina Kebir GUATEMALA (franchising): Ruby Asturias Castillo ROMANIA (agency and distribution) : Cristina Tararache SOUTH AFRICA (franchising): Eugene Honey SPAIN (franchising): Alberto Echarri The new reports can be found in the Reports Section of the IDI website […]

Read More…